Capability · the moat
Shortlists you can defend, line by line
A score with no reasoning is a liability. Trasor's matching engine ranks people against the agreed spec and attaches the evidence behind every result.
What makes it different
Matching that explains itself
Both sides ranked
Candidates are scored against the role, and roles against the candidate's goals — so fit is mutual, not one-directional.
Reasons attached
Each match cites the evidence behind it — skills, work history, assessments — drawn from the candidate's Professional Record.
Defensible by design
Every ranking is traceable and reviewable, with human override always in the loop. The moat incumbents can't copy with UI polish.
Under the hood
An architecture, not a single model
Matching is designed as selectable engines rather than one opaque score. The ranking quality is the core story — so it's instrumented, evaluated, and improved with real outcome labels.
- Ranks against the structured request, not keyword soup.
- Match outcomes are captured and labeled, so the engine keeps learning.
- Surfaces near-matches and the specific gaps that hold a candidate back.
- Every decision keeps a human reviewer in control.
match.result
Strong · 3 evidence items
Strong · verified assessment
Partial · 1 project
Gap · no evidence yet
Rank on evidence, not vibes
See how an explainable shortlist reads when every result comes with its reasons.